ALASKA STORES ANSWER TO USDA, NOT TO THE STATE · TEN DAYS FROM RECEIPT
212 300 5196
SNAPVIOLATIONS.COM / VIOLATIONS / ALASKA
ALASKA · USDA FNS WESTERN REGION · SNAP

A Alaska store has ten days to answer the USDA.

In Alaska, SNAP benefits are issued by the Division of Public Assistance - but the letter threatening your authorization isn’t a state letter. It comes from USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service, and it gives you ten days from receipt under 7 CFR 278.6(b)(1). Village stores fly in inventory and price it accordingly, which makes basket sizes look extraordinary against any national comparison set. We defend Alaska retailers on that clock, from anywhere in the country, and the first conversation costs nothing.

ALASKA AT A GLANCE
DEFAULT SANCTION
Disqualification, or a money penalty
YOUR WINDOW
10 days from receipt of the letter
WAY OUT
A documented response, filed on time
In a trafficking case, a written civil money penalty request under 278.6(i) must be in that same filing.
WHERE A SUIT IS FILED
the District of Alaska, within thirty days of the final agency decision under 7 U.S.C. 2023.
WHO IS DEFENDING YOUR STORE
If you’re reading this, USDA is threatening your store and you need serious help - we get it. Spodek Law Group P.C. is second generation, practicing since 1976, and dramatized in Netflix’s Inventing Anna. We owe loyalty to only you.
1976SINCE
50STATES
1,100+5-STAR REVIEWS
24/7A PERSON ANSWERS
THE FIRM · WHY US

We owe loyalty to only you.

When you’re looking online, you have multiple options. There are so many firms advertising SNAP defense. Thankfully, your search is over. Spodek Law Group P.C. offers premier white-glove service and we’re unafraid of fighting. Unlike firms that are more focused on their relationship with the agency than with you, we owe loyalty to only YOU. Your store, your family, your license.

One reason our firm has such a high success rate is that we’re selective about who we work with. If we’re choosing to work with you, it’s because we think we can make a positive impact. That’s vastly different from firms that take on any client willing to pay. When you reach out, you start with a risk-free consultation - and you can ask us anything you want, regardless of how long it takes.

If there’s a way to keep your store in the program, we’ll find it. That’s the whole job.

Start with the risk-free consultation NO OBLIGATION · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7
THE SIMPLE BELIEF
We should only take on clients we can actually help.
01 · A PERSON ANSWERS
Not a service, not a call center. Day or night, an attorney picks up - and strategy starts the day you call.
02 · TRANSPARENT FEES
We’re transparent about what this costs. There are no surprises, and we’re committed to fighting for your case irrespective of your ability to pay.
03 · NATIONWIDE, COAST TO COAST
One of the few firms with a fully online client portal - every filing, invoice and document, from day one, wherever your store is.
★★★★★ 1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
WHAT IS ALASKA-SPECIFIC, AND WHAT IS NOT

Six things Alaska owners need straight before they answer.

01
The letter is federal
Charge letters, determinations and disqualifications come from USDA FNS - the Western Region works out of San Francisco. No Alaska office issues them and no Alaska official can extend the ten days.
02
What the state does control
The Division of Public Assistance certifies households and issues SNAP benefits. It doesn’t decide whether your store keeps its authorization, and calling it will not stop your clock.
03
Where a lawsuit lands
If the agency’s final decision goes against you, the action is filed in the District of Alaska - de novo review under 7 U.S.C. 2023, within thirty days.
04
The retail picture here
Village and bush stores shape how Alaska stores trade, and ALERT compares each of them against peers the model only assumes are similar.
05
The WIC track
WIC is administered by a Alaska state agency on its own timeline. A SNAP sanction routinely triggers a WIC action, and each proceeding becomes evidence in the other.
06
If it turns criminal
Large figures draw the USDA Office of Inspector General and the United States Attorney’s Offices covering the District of Alaska. Anything written to FNS can be read there.
FREE DEADLINE CHECK
Tell us the date on the envelope. We’ll tell you what day you’re on.
Risk-free, no obligation, answered the same day. A person answers - not a service.
THE DEFENSE · FIVE MOVES

Ten days, Alaska or anywhere else. Same discipline.

There’s no hearing and no oral argument in this stage. Whatever is filed inside the ten days is the whole case for the store, so it gets built in a fixed order.

Have your letter read today
01
Fix the receipt date
The clock runs from when the letter reached the store, not the date printed on it. Keep the envelope and the certified mail record.
02
File the penalty request first
Where trafficking is charged, the written request for a civil money penalty in lieu goes in immediately. 278.6(b)(2)(iii) forecloses it if it’s late.
03
Answer the attachment line by line
Every flagged transaction gets a customer, a basket and a reason. Unanswered lines are treated as conceded.
04
Prove the food existed
Wholesale invoices, delivery records, inventory counts and shelf photographs. If purchases match redemptions, the exchange theory weakens.
05
Build the four criteria
A dated compliance policy, proof it ran at this Alaska location before the flagged dates, signed training records, and evidence separating ownership from the conduct.
THE TEN DAYS · WHAT TO PULL TONIGHT

Four documents, already inside your Alaska store.

Walk us through them →
THE ENVELOPE
The certified mail record fixes the receipt date, and the receipt date fixes the deadline. Owners who guess lose days they had.
INVOICES
Every wholesaler for the review period, cash-and-carry receipts included. This is how you show the groceries existed.
REGISTER DATA
Itemized exports or Z-tapes for the flagged dates. A basket list against a dollar amount is the most persuasive document available.
THE COMPLIANCE FILE
Written store rules, signed training sheets, register signage photographs. Dated matters more than detailed.
THE BRIEFING
ALASKA SNAP DEFENSE
USDA FNS WESTERN
SNAP
UPDATED 2026
ON CALL 24/7
212 300 5196

SNAP violation defense in Alaska: who decides, what they see, and what to file

Nothing about the charge letter is a state matter. In Alaska the Division of Public Assistance runs SNAP for households, but retailer sanctions belong to USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service, whose Western Region operates out of San Francisco. That distinction matters on day one, because owners lose time calling the wrong agency. You get ten days from receipt - 7 CFR 278.6(b)(1) - and the agency refuses extensions.

Village stores fly in inventory and price it accordingly, which makes basket sizes look extraordinary against any national comparison set. Village and bush stores produce redemption patterns that have nothing in common with the stores ALERT chooses as peers. Almost every case starts in the data, through the Anti-Fraud Locator using EBT Retailer Transactions. The peer group is where the analysis breaks down, because similarity is assumed rather than known.

If the letter says trafficking, 278.6(e)(1) puts permanent disqualification on the table immediately. The regulation reaches conduct by personnel of the firm, so a clerk’s act is attributed to the store and the owner’s knowledge isn’t a defense to the finding. A timely written request for a penalty in lieu is what preserves the authorization. Miss it and 278.6(b)(2)(iii) makes the store permanently ineligible for the penalty.

What actually moves a Alaska case is documentary. The answer is documentary: what you bought, what you sold, and what was on the shelf. Where the charge is a pattern of ineligible items rather than trafficking, the sanction is a term on the ladder at 7 CFR 278.6(e) - six months to five years - and proportion, itemized baskets and a documented compliance program are what pull it down a rung.

7 CFR 279 review comes next, with a fresh reader and room for new evidence. After that, 7 U.S.C. 2023 permits a complaint within thirty days, reviewed de novo. For Alaska retailers that means the District of Alaska, and it means the review record you build now is the record a judge reads later.

If a charge letter is sitting on the counter of your Alaska store, the ten days are already running. Call today, read us the first line, and bring the attachment - we’ll tell you what day you’re on and what can still be filed.

GENERAL INFORMATION · NOT LEGAL ADVICE · NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP Speak with counsel now →
THE BENCH

This bench answers its own phone. Put it on your case.

Second generation, practicing since 1976. Your case isn’t handed to a paralegal and a template - a lawyer reads the attachment, calls your wholesaler, and drafts the response. Every client holds the senior partner’s cell number.
Spodek Law Group - the team
SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · NEW YORK
Todd Spodek
Todd Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Ralph Franco
Ralph Franco
SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C.
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Jeremy Feigenbaum
SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C.
Claire Banks
Claire Banks
SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C.
Alex Zhik
Alex Zhik
SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C.
QUESTIONS · ALASKA
01 Can the Division of Public Assistance help me with this?
No, and the call costs you time. The Division of Public Assistance certifies households and issues SNAP benefits. Your authorization to accept those benefits is a federal matter handled by USDA FNS, and only a timely filing with FNS protects it.
02 Do I need a lawyer in Alaska?
You need a lawyer who does this work. The proceeding is federal and it’s conducted on paper, so location matters far less than experience with charge letters, the four criteria of 278.6(i), and administrative review. We represent Alaska retailers from wherever the store is.
03 Where would my case go if I have to sue?
To the District of Alaska, under 7 U.S.C. 2023, within thirty days of the final agency decision. Review there’s de novo - the court decides the validity of the action on evidence rather than deferring to FNS.
04 My store is the only one nearby. Does that matter?
It can matter twice. It explains the volume that got you flagged, and where a term disqualification would leave Alaska households without a comparable store, 7 CFR 278.6(f) allows a money penalty instead of the months. Both arguments have to be made in the response.
SEND THE LETTER TO COUNSEL

Tell us what happened. Eight fields, two minutes - and a lawyer reads it today.

RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · ANSWERED WITHIN 24 HOURS, GUARANTEED
Counsel reading a client file
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
Today. A lawyer reads the letter and fixes your real deadline from the receipt date. You’ll know where you stand before we hang up.
Day one. If trafficking is charged, the written penalty request goes in immediately.
Days two to nine. Invoices, register data, inventory and the compliance file get assembled.
Before day ten. The response is filed, transaction by transaction, with exhibits.
★★★★★ 1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
THE ASK

Read us the first line of the letter. We’ll tell you what day you’re on.

Bring the envelope, the attachment, and your invoices if you have them. If you don’t have them, bring the letter. The consultation is risk-free, it stays between us, and it happens today - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes.

Call 212 300 5196
24/7 · CONFIDENTIAL · NATIONWIDE
THE HARD RULES, IN ALASKA
Ten days from receipt. No Alaska official can extend it. The Division of Public Assistance doesn’t decide your authorization. The CMP request must be in the first filing or it’s gone. A clerk’s conduct is attributed to the store. Suit goes to the District of Alaska within thirty days.
Call now · 212 300 5196